I thought I would post a few quick words on where I’ve been for the past 2 months (certainly not writing quality content for this blog). The past 60 days have been very hectic as I’ve started down the final stretch of designing, building and lighting a new data center. Thankfully the team and I are no strangers to moving computer rooms or constructing new buildings so we’re keenly aware of all the technical details needed to be successful in such a large endeavor.
I have so many short stories to share but no time to share them… In any event I’m now getting up to speed with a lot of new equipment, specifically Cisco’s Nexus gear.
What equipment did we use?
- Cisco Nexus 7010
- Cisco Nexus 5010
- Cisco Nexus 2148
- Cisco Catalyst 3750E
- Cisco Catalyst 2960G
- Cisco ASA5520
- Cisco ACE 4710
- Cisco AS5300 (yes we still have some dial-up users/vendors)
- Cisco 7301 Router
- Cisco 2821 Router
What racks did we use for the network equipment?
- Liebert Knurr Racks
- Liebert MPH/MPX PDUs
What equipment did we use for the servers/blades?
- HP Rack 10000 G2
- HP Rack PDU (AF503A)
- HP IP KVM Console (AF601A)
- HP BladeSystem c7000 Enclosure
- HP Virtual Connect Flex-10 Interconnect
- HP SAN 8Gb Interconnect
- HP BL460c G6
- HP BL490c G6
- HP DL380 G6
- HP DL360 G6
What are we using for storage?
- IBM XIV System Storage (SAN) (w/4 1Gbps iSCSI replication ports)
- IBM SAN80B-4 SAN Switch
Additional miscellaneous equipment;
- MRV LX-4048T (terminal server)
- Brother P-Touch PT-2100 / Brady ID PRO Plus label makers
As some of you might know we selected Cisco as the network electronics vendor and have implemented their Cisco Nexus 7010 switches as our core, followed by the Nexus 5010 switches as distribution to the Nexus 2148 (FEX) switches in a top of rack configuration. We also utilized Catalyst 2960G switches for our management/out-of-band network given that the Nexus 2148 only supports 1000BaseT, no 10Mbps or 100Mbps connectivity. Of course Cisco is in the process of releasing the Nexus 2248 which supports 100/1000Mbps connectivity to edge devices. We chose to utilize the HP Virtual Connect Flex-10 in our VM enclosures and we’ll utilize the Cisco 3120X in our non-VM enclosures. We’ve also installed and configured the Nexus 1000V in coordination with our VMware vSphere 4 environment. We decided that the CEE/DCE/FCoE revolution wasn’t quite here yet, or perhaps we weren’t quite ready for it so we stayed with a traditional Fiber Channel infrastructure around two IBM (oem Brocade) 80 port 8Gbps SAN switches. For SAN replication we’ll be using multiple 1Gbps iSCSI ports over a 10GE WAN. We ended up with an IBM XIV so we’ll have to see if it can keep up with all the traffic that’s going to be thrown it’s way.
So there should certainly be no shortage of material to talk about with all this new equipment, however, I’m certainly going to be very busy the next six months.
Here are some pictures of the cage (under 800 sq ft) , if interested. You’ll notice the chair and the upgrade that we performed on it in the last two pictures.
Cheers!
Wayne says
No Nortel Gear Michael. Does this mean we wont see anymore Nortel posts from you. Please keep all that knowledge in your head.
You are an amazing source of knowledge on this gear.
Data Centre looks good. I bet your having some fun though.
Michael McNamara says
Hi Wayne,
It’s true that there was no Nortel/Avaya gear utilized in this data center. However, in the larger scheme though I have around 33,000 switch ports based on Nortel/Avaya equipment and only < 1,000 switch ports based on Cisco equipment.Cheers!
TheKingSlacker says
Awesome! Looks great.. I love the ergonomic chair.
Adam Dacosta says
Looks great… sad to see (even though small amounts) cisco. but sounds like a great project!
Ray J says
How are the Nexus 7010’s working out? We are looking at swapping our 8600’s for the 7010’s.
Adam DaCosta says
Why on earth would you swap out your 8600s?
Ray J says
We are going to migrate away from Nortel to Cisco. Will be doing core first and then edge.
We have experienced issues that Avaya has been unable to resolve and getting assistance with it has been a huge undertaking that has made life more difficult that it should be.
The support from Avaya has been poor at best. When one of our engineers has to call support, I think they would rather take a needle to the eye.
I have always maintained that it does not matter what name is on the equipment as it all works basically the same, it is the level of service that you get and right now that is where Avaya is failing us. It is sad because I have used Nortel gear since the Synoptics/Wellfleet days pre-Bay Networks.
Adam Dacosta says
Ray J,
Has Avaya not responded in kind? I have been dealing with Nortel/Avaya for over a decade + on the data side and have not head of their support being compared to a ‘needle in the eye’ ;)
is there anything I can do to help? How about an Avaya executive visit, to show some support and commitment!?
As for the product, I can understand that in some cases that most gear all works the same. But when it comes to core chassis…. and talking about performance, TCO, Power consumption, resiliency etc. Avaya is has the best solution! Let alone priced the most competitively!
Also with Avaya’s access technology, Cisco’s is incomparable.
Let me know what/if anything can be done to help you with your support issues.
AD