Comments on: Adopting US Access Ports in GB – Ooppss https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2014/11/adopting-us-access-ports-in-gb-ooppss/ technology, networking, virtualization and IP telephony Sun, 23 Nov 2014 14:55:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: Michael McNamara https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2014/11/adopting-us-access-ports-in-gb-ooppss/comment-page-1/#comment-76679 Sun, 23 Nov 2014 14:55:18 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=4560#comment-76679 In reply to mata.

You are correct… I was just pointing out that the traffic is tunneled between the AP and the switch. I’m curious now is there a protocol decode for MINT in Wireshark? I recall debugging WISP years ago when there was not protocol decode.

Cheers!

]]> By: mata https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2014/11/adopting-us-access-ports-in-gb-ooppss/comment-page-1/#comment-76658 Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:06:47 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=4560#comment-76658 Small correction. Wing 5 uses MiNT protocol. In wing 4 it was WISP/WiSPE.
Looking forward to see what kind of troubles you are facing with captive portal.
Cheers!

]]> By: Del Bullion https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2014/11/adopting-us-access-ports-in-gb-ooppss/comment-page-1/#comment-76614 Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:30:10 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=4560#comment-76614 Great post on multiple levels. I am going to borrow this idea of setting up a RAP connected to remote sites for troubleshooting from afar.

]]>