Comments on: UNIStim Firmware Release 4.0 for Nortel IP Phones https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/ technology, networking, virtualization and IP telephony Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:36:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: colin ryan https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-8702 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:36:16 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-8702 You know as well as I know that “intentional” in this business is a grey area. I don’t pretend to be a know it all in this area especially on the phone side, but as far as I can seem to tell no-one has gotten this to connect with an ASA for example on recent UNIStim firmwares. And as I said I have a racoon profile that works for Cisco Windows client, OSX Cisco Client and iOS Cisco Client…fails with “Avaya VPN” as the protocol for UNIStim… which is the only available option as far as I can see for PSK/XAuth authentication.

IPSec is and always has been a messy combination of too many options and too many implementations. No surprise I suppose that they expect “all in” with Avaya platforms as the only supported. So far I’ve had no luck, I even hacked racoon to simply accept the offending proposal attribute…get’s past that phase but doesn’t seem to be handling the NAT-T payloads in the next step…but I could easily be missing something. Shame really I was hoping I could support these phones on an open platform.. But even the Avaya VPN Windows client sends the 32767 attribute and on top of that sends DH 8 which I believe is some Elliptical curve stuff which racoon developers have stated they will not implement as there are patentable elements in those areas.

Cheers

]]>
By: Michael McNamara https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-8699 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:10:00 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-8699 In reply to colin ryan.

Hi Colin,

I know the UNIStim VPN Client (UVC) worked fine between an 1120E and an Avaya VPN 1700 Router.

You’re suggesting that Avaya intentionally made it incompatible with third-party VPN routers? I don’t know if that’s the case or if there was some underlying technical issue. I don’t ever believe reading that the UVC was intended to be used with anything other than an Avaya VPN router so I’m not sure it was even in the “not supported” realm.

Thanks for the comment!

]]>
By: colin ryan https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-8637 Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:30:44 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-8637 I’ve been fight this fo r days. I think the answer per usual is to bad so sad. It appears that the Avaya/Nortel VPN clients sends a proprietary attribute. I see this causing no proposal match on my ipsec-tools (linux raccon) implementation against a profile the regularly works with “Cisco VPN” profiles (i.e. iOS, Max, Windows Cisco). So once again vendor BS goes beyond “not supported” to “doesn’t work”

]]>
By: Christopher Green https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-6904 Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:45:38 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-6904 I’ve attempted to get this working but it appears there is a IKEv1 Policy Mismatch as every attempt displays “All IKE SA proposals found unacceptable!”.

Does anyone know what IKE Proposals the 1140e sends at phase 1?

Chris.

]]>
By: Michael McNamara https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-5960 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:55:58 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-5960 In reply to novice.

Hi Novice,

I’m not so sure I would agree with your assumption that IPSec is IPsec. I’ve had years of pure fun (being cynical) building branch VPN tunnels across different platforms using Cisco, Nortel, CheckPoint, Juniper, Linux, etc.

It’s possible that it might work but someone needs to test it out and see if actually works.

Thanks for the comment!

]]>
By: novice https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-5954 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:21:02 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-5954


khalil abua asal:

hi all: i’m intending to establish a VPN connection between Nortel 1140E phone behind a an ADSL SOHO router and a Cisco ASA 5510 appliance, but the connection doesn’t come up, i configured the PSK user id and password, the XAUTH user ID and passowrd on the phone but with no use, the error that keeps showing up on cisco ASA is: unknown tunnel-group id. can any one confirm to me if the cpn client on the Nortel 1140E phone is compatible with Cisco ASA appliances or not???Regards

Has anyone tried and got this working with Cisco ASA, I cant image Avaya would of made a custom IPSec client and not just natively create an IPSec client that is universal. I mean IPSec is IPSec

]]>
By: gwebster https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3696 Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:04:17 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-3696 The integrated VPN Client in the 1140E is only tested for compatability with Avaya (formerly Nortel) appliances.

]]>
By: khalil abua asal https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3681 Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:10:51 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-3681 hi all:
i’m intending to establish a VPN connection between Nortel 1140E phone behind a an ADSL SOHO router and a Cisco ASA 5510 appliance, but the connection doesn’t come up, i configured the PSK user id and password, the XAUTH user ID and passowrd on the phone but with no use, the error that keeps showing up on cisco ASA is:
unknown tunnel-group id.
can any one confirm to me if the cpn client on the Nortel 1140E phone is compatible with Cisco ASA appliances or not???

Regards

]]>
By: Former Nortel expert https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-2442 Sun, 08 Aug 2010 02:52:55 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-2442 There are SIP versions of firmware available for the 1165E, and the rest of the 11x0E family as well. The recent SIP firmware loads have much higher levels of security than what is offered with UNIstim.

]]>
By: Michael McNamara https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-1854 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:29:35 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-1854 In reply to jephph.

Hi Jephph,

Thanks for sharing that information… when I have the opportunity I hope to test the 1120e UVC wtih the Nortel VPN Router 1700 running V07_05.350.

Thanks again!

]]>
By: jephph https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-1847 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:44:28 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-1847 We are using a Contivity 1010 running version 4_85.160 and it terminates these11xx tunnels without a problem. As a matter of fact, they work great.

]]>
By: Michael McNamara https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-1840 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:57:45 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-1840 In reply to Steve.

Hi Steve,

I haven’t personally tried it but I’ve learned over the years that just because something isn’t supported doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t work. With that said if you did get it to work you might have to weigh the risk of going into a production environment with an unsupported configuration.

I have two 1700s and one 1740 all running 7.x software. I could probably test it out for you if you are really curious… or it might become immediately clear that it won’t work without some feature in 8.x software.

Cheers!

]]>
By: Gord https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-1834 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:19:37 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-1834 UNIStim 4.1 was just released. It allows interop between the UNIStim VPN Client in the 1120E/1140E/1150E/1165E and Avaya (formerly Nortel) VPN Gateway family running software release 8.01 or greater.

]]>
By: Steve https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-1833 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:34:30 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-1833 Has anyone attempted to configure this tunnel with software release lower that 8?

]]>
By: Michael McNamara https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-1516 Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:18:10 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-1516 In reply to Gord.

Hi Gord,

It would have been nice for Nortel to have left that decision up to the user/customer. I wonder how difficult MAC security would be to implement on the PC port?

In any event I can understand the desire to keep voice and data traffic separate and as you commented a lot of organizations already have remote access solutions in place.

Thanks for the comment!

]]>
By: Gord https://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/12/unistim-firmware-release-4-0-for-nortel-ip-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-1513 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:00:44 +0000 http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=1147#comment-1513 Not encrypting the traffic through the PC port was deliberate to prevent a huge security hole. Take an example of a home user connecting a WiFi router into the PC port and unintentionally not using any security over the WiFi. Any drive-by/neighbour WiFi snooper would then have direct access into your corporate network if the data through the PC port was also tunneled over the VPN.

]]>