Michael McNamara

Michael McNamara

(1165 comments, 420 posts)

This user hasn't shared any profile information

Home page: http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com

Jabber/GTalk: mcnamm

Posts by Michael McNamara

Cisco Nexus 1000V Upgrade to 4.2(1)SV1(4)

0

I just recently completed an upgrade of our Cisco Nexus 1000V from 4.0(4)SV1(3) to 4.2(1)SV1(4). Prior to proceeding with the Cisco Nexus 1000V upgrade we had to first upgrade vCenter to 4.1, Update Manager to 4.1 Update 1 and lastly the VMware ESX hosts themselves to 4.1. With all that complete we set out to upgrade the Cisco Nexus 1000V but quickly ran into a few problems.

Pre-Upgrade Script

The Pre-Upgrade Script, a TCL script which checks your Cisco Nexus 1000V configuration for any potential issues, immediately flag our Port Channel configurations in Check 2.

###############################################################################
## COMPANY NAME: Cisco Systems Inc                                           ##
## Copyright © 2011 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights Reserved.                 ##
##                                                                           ##
## SCRIPT NAME: pre-upgrade-check-4.2(1)SV1(4).tcl                           ##
## VERSION: 1.0                                                              ##
## DESCRIPTION: This script is applicable to all releases prior to           ##
##              4.2(1)SV1(4).                                                ##
##                                                                           ##

...
...
...

=========
 CHECK 2:
=========
Checking for Interface override configurations on Port-channnel Interface ...
###############################################################################
##                           FAIL                                            ##
##                                                                           ##
## List of Port-Channel Interface(s) with interface level configuration(s)   ##

1: port-channel1 has below overrides.
mtu 9000

2: port-channel2 has below overrides.
mtu 9000

3: port-channel3 has below overrides.
mtu 9000

4: port-channel4 has below overrides.
mtu 9000

...
...
...

While originally testing the Cisco Nexus 1000V prior to going into production some 463 days earlier we had played around with enabling Jumbo Frame support within the VM environment. We had set the MTU on the individual port-channel configurations to 9000. Now the pre-upgrade script was telling us that we needed to clean this up and remove any specific configuration from the port-channel and instead apply it to the port-profile configuration. I added the system mtu 9000 command to the port-profile but got a few surprises when I tried to remove the MTU command. The first surprise when I issued the “inter po1, no mtu 9000″ was loosing connectivity to the VM guests on that host. I had to manually restart the VEM on the ESX host with the “vem restart” command from an CLI prompt. The second surprise was that “mtu 9000″ in the configuration had been replaced by “mtu 1500″. That wasn’t going to work so I had to reach out to Cisco TAC who immediately recognized the issue and provided a workaround;

On the ESX host stop the VEM

vem stop

Then on the Cisco Nexus 1000V delete the port-channels and associated VEM (I’ll use the first server as an example assuming there are two VSMs installed)

config
no inter po1
no inter po2
no vem 3

On the ESX host start the VEM

vem start

And sure enough it worked just as promised… recreating the port-channels without the MTU commands. Obviously we had to put each ESX host into maintenance mode before we could just stop and start the VEM.

With that taken care of we started upgrading the VEMs using Update Manager. Unfortunately Update Manager only made it through about 6 ESX hosts before it got stuck. We had to manually install the update VIB on the remaining 12 ESX hosts ourselves. We utilized FileZilla to copy the VIB up to each server and the utilized PuTTY to SSH into each server and manually update the VEM;

[root@esx-srv1-dc1-pa ~]# esxupdate -b ./cross_cisco-vem-v130-4.2.1.1.4.0.0-2.0.1.vib update
Unpacking cross_cisco-vem-v130-esx_4.2.1.1.. ############################################################# [100%]

Installing cisco-vem-v130-esx                ############################################################# [100%]

Running [rpm -e cisco-vem-v120-esx]...
ok.
Running [/usr/sbin/vmkmod-install.sh]...
ok.

With all the ESX hosts upgrade we had to physically reboot the vCenter server to get the currently running VUM task to fail so we could complete the upgrade from the Cisco Nexus 1000V.

Next we launched the upgrade application and before long we had the standby VSM upgraded to 4.2(1)SV1(4). Here’s where we ran into another small scare. After the upgrade of the standby VSM the upgraded VEMs are supposed to re-register to the newly upgraded VSM. We waited about 5 minutes an none of the VEMs had discnonected from the primary VSM running 4.0(4)SV1(3) to the standby VSM that was now running 4.2(1)SV1(4). It was only approximately 15-20 minutes later (while searching Google for some hint) that the VEMs just up and started to connect to the newly upgraded standby VSM.

Cheers!

Avaya 2245 Wireless Gateway QoS Settings

0

The Nortel/Avaya 2245 Wireless Gateway is a essentially a protocol translator running Linux. The wireless gateway bridges between the Nortel/Avaya OEM’d SpectraLink wireless handsets (6120, 6140) which utilize SpectraLink Voice Priority (SVP) and the Avaya Call Server 1000, Signaling Server, and Voice Gateway Media Cards running UNIStim.

Unfortunately the 2245 doesn’t ship with the correct QoS configuration and instead must be manually configured in order to attain the proper DiffServ/QoS markings between the wireless telephones (WT), the 2245 and the call server.

From the main menu of the 2245 select SVP-II Configuration, then select QoS Configuration and modify the options as depicted below;

                               QoS Configuration
                Hostname: [slnk-011111], Address: 10.1.1.10

        Traffic Class DSCP Tag
     ---------------- ----------
       Administration Default
         WT (In call) 46
         WT (Standby) 40
                  RTP 46
                  PBX 40
           Inter-SVP2 Default

Cheers!

vSphere ESXi 4.1 U1 NIC Teaming Cisco Nexus vPC

0

I had a very interesting problem this past week that I thought I would share and even seek comment on. We have quite a few vSphere ESX 4.0 and even vSphere ESX 4.1 hosts running in our network. This past week we installed 2 HP DL-380 servers with vSphere ESXi 4.1 Update 1 and we immediately noticed an issue with NIC teaming on the management interface (vmk0). We were connecting the ESXi 4.1 hosts to a pair of Cisco Nexus 7010 switches over a virtual port-channel (vPC). I should comment that this is our first ESXi deployment, all previous VMware deployments had been ESX.

Loss of connectivity

In the past we’ve taken different approaches with respect to how to configure the core/distribution network switches when connecting them to ESX servers for NIC teaming. In some instances we’ve created SMLTs, MLTs (Nortel/Avaya) or vPCs, PCs (Cisco) depending on the location and equipment. In this instance no matter how we configured the switch port we would always loose network connectivity to the management interface the moment we brought up the second NIC. We had VMware ESX 4.1 hosts running from the exact same Cisco Nexus 7010s so I was at a loss to immediately explain the problem.

Solution – VMware KB Article

Thankfully I’ve become a master (as many have many other technical folks) in the use of Google and pretty quickly stumbled across VMware KB article 1022751 entitled, NIC teaming using EtherChannel leads to intermittent network connectivity in ESXi.

When trying to team NICs using EtherChannel, the network connectivity is disrupted on an ESXi host. This issue occurs because NIC teaming properties do not propagate to the Management Network portgroup in ESXi. When you configure the ESXi host for NIC teaming by setting the Load Balancing to Route based on ip hash, this configuration is not propagated to Management Network portgroup.

I’ll be the first to admit that I haven’t spent too much time with ESXi, but seeing that VMware has already commented the ESX will be going way I probably need to do some catching up.

Cheers!

Michael McNamara's RSS Feed
Go to Top