<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Routing Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/</link>
	<description>technology, networking and IP telephony</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McNamara</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>Hi Sno,

I&#039;d love to hear the reasoning behind the IST VLAN ID having to be set to 2. There is no requirement that the IST VLAN be any specific number nor that the MLT ID be any specific number. Actually you can use different MLT IDs on each core switch, obviously you need to use the same VLAN ID on both switches though.

In my experiences VRRP is nice but it causes a lot of scaling issues as the number of VRRP instances grow. Depending on which software release you are running I would suggest that you use RSMLT in place of VRRP. I&#039;ve found that RSMLT is much more behaved and uses a lot less resources than VRRP.

In any event (depending on the software release) you are probably running up against a scaling issue where the VRRP hellos are not being processed fast enough. You could keep VRRP, disable the FAST-ADV feature and use the Backup Master feature. This would provide instantaneous fail-over and also help load-balance the traffic between your VRRP peers.

Good Luck with the VLAN conversion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sno,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear the reasoning behind the IST VLAN ID having to be set to 2. There is no requirement that the IST VLAN be any specific number nor that the MLT ID be any specific number. Actually you can use different MLT IDs on each core switch, obviously you need to use the same VLAN ID on both switches though.</p>
<p>In my experiences VRRP is nice but it causes a lot of scaling issues as the number of VRRP instances grow. Depending on which software release you are running I would suggest that you use RSMLT in place of VRRP. I&#8217;ve found that RSMLT is much more behaved and uses a lot less resources than VRRP.</p>
<p>In any event (depending on the software release) you are probably running up against a scaling issue where the VRRP hellos are not being processed fast enough. You could keep VRRP, disable the FAST-ADV feature and use the Backup Master feature. This would provide instantaneous fail-over and also help load-balance the traffic between your VRRP peers.</p>
<p>Good Luck with the VLAN conversion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SnoProG</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>SnoProG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got two Passports with their IST&#039;s on slot 3,7 ports 1 and 30, respectively. We are in the process of changing all of our legacy vlans from byipsubnet to byport...fun fun fun.

We are running fast advertisement enabled on both Passports after a vlan is converted:

e.g. config vlan 1241 ip vrrp 241 fast-adv-enable enable

I am getting a lot of continuous log entries showing a vrrp state change, although a state change is not taking place, based on the vrrp uptime indicator. I am going to turn this feature off to stop the messages. From what I&#039;ve been told from our network architects, the reason for the log entry is because my IST VLAN ID number should be 2, whereas, my Passports IST VLAN ID 301 at this time.

Any comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got two Passports with their IST&#8217;s on slot 3,7 ports 1 and 30, respectively. We are in the process of changing all of our legacy vlans from byipsubnet to byport&#8230;fun fun fun.</p>
<p>We are running fast advertisement enabled on both Passports after a vlan is converted:</p>
<p>e.g. config vlan 1241 ip vrrp 241 fast-adv-enable enable</p>
<p>I am getting a lot of continuous log entries showing a vrrp state change, although a state change is not taking place, based on the vrrp uptime indicator. I am going to turn this feature off to stop the messages. From what I&#8217;ve been told from our network architects, the reason for the log entry is because my IST VLAN ID number should be 2, whereas, my Passports IST VLAN ID 301 at this time.</p>
<p>Any comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McNamara</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>Well from with Java Device Manager just look under IP Routing -&gt; VRRP click on the Interfaces tab and then scroll all the way to the right of the screen and you&#039;ll see the options for Backup Master.

I just checked this against a switch running 6.1.3 software.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well from with Java Device Manager just look under IP Routing -> VRRP click on the Interfaces tab and then scroll all the way to the right of the screen and you&#8217;ll see the options for Backup Master.</p>
<p>I just checked this against a switch running 6.1.3 software.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madan</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>madan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>how to configur backup master in nortel switch 5530?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to configur backup master in nortel switch 5530?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McNamara</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas,

It can be fairly complicated to add VRRP and/or HSRP. It&#039;s certainly not something that you should undertake without completely understanding what you are doing.  Outside of the commands provided in the above article you can post over in the forums if you have additional questions; 
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.networkinfrastructure.info/nortel-ethernet-switching/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forums.networkinfrastructure.info/nortel-ethernet-switching/&lt;/a&gt;

Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas,</p>
<p>It can be fairly complicated to add VRRP and/or HSRP. It&#8217;s certainly not something that you should undertake without completely understanding what you are doing.  Outside of the commands provided in the above article you can post over in the forums if you have additional questions;<br />
 <a href="http://forums.networkinfrastructure.info/nortel-ethernet-switching/" rel="nofollow">http://forums.networkinfrastructure.info/nortel-ethernet-switching/</a></p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>We are using ERS 8600 as core switch.We are planing for a Core switch redundancy..
Couild u please tell me the configurations that i have to do during the activity.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are using ERS 8600 as core switch.We are planing for a Core switch redundancy..<br />
Couild u please tell me the configurations that i have to do during the activity.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McNamara</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Hopefully that fixed your problem. 

Please feel free to post any other questions in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.networkinfrastructure.info/nortel-ethernet-switching/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ethernet Switching forums&lt;/a&gt;.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully that fixed your problem. </p>
<p>Please feel free to post any other questions in the <a href="http://forums.networkinfrastructure.info/nortel-ethernet-switching/" rel="nofollow">Ethernet Switching forums</a>.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Kruger</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for your help.

Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for your help.</p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McNamara</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>Hi Ryan,

You have a mis-configuration between the two VRRP routers. You probably have Fast Advertisement enabled on one but disabled on the other. Assuming that your VRIDs match your VLAN IDs you could issue the following command on both your ERS 8600 switches;

&lt;pre&gt;ERS-8610:5# config vlan 8 ip vrrp 8 info

Sub-Context: clear config dump monitor show test trace wsm asfm sam
Current Context:

                      action : none
                     address : IP ADDRESS OF VRRP INTERFACE
                   adver-int : 1
               backup-master : enable
                 critical-ip : 0.0.0.0
          critical-ip-enable : disable
                fast-adv-int : 200
             fast-adv-enable : disable
                      delete : N/A
                 vrrp enable : enable
              holddown-timer : 0
                    priority : 100
&lt;/pre&gt;

The settings should be identical on both ERS 8600 switches. It sounds to me like someone has enabled Fast Advertisement on one of the switches but left it disabled on the other switch. Just go ahead and disable Fast Advertisement (fast-adv-enable) and the error should clear.

Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan,</p>
<p>You have a mis-configuration between the two VRRP routers. You probably have Fast Advertisement enabled on one but disabled on the other. Assuming that your VRIDs match your VLAN IDs you could issue the following command on both your ERS 8600 switches;</p>
<pre>ERS-8610:5# config vlan 8 ip vrrp 8 info

Sub-Context: clear config dump monitor show test trace wsm asfm sam
Current Context:

                      action : none
                     address : IP ADDRESS OF VRRP INTERFACE
                   adver-int : 1
               backup-master : enable
                 critical-ip : 0.0.0.0
          critical-ip-enable : disable
                fast-adv-int : 200
             fast-adv-enable : disable
                      delete : N/A
                 vrrp enable : enable
              holddown-timer : 0
                    priority : 100
</pre>
<p>The settings should be identical on both ERS 8600 switches. It sounds to me like someone has enabled Fast Advertisement on one of the switches but left it disabled on the other switch. Just go ahead and disable Fast Advertisement (fast-adv-enable) and the error should clear.</p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Kruger</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/2009/01/virtual-routing-redundancy-protocol-vrrp/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelfmcnamara.com/?p=602#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>We are running two 8600s connected via IST, and with VRRP, but I noticed in my log files that I receive the following messages : 

CPU5 [07/28/09 09:41:15] IP ERROR rcIpVrrpIn: Misconfigured Advertisement type (Fast Advtisement) for Vrid 8 on IfIndex 2054, Local type:regular Advertisement

The VRRP is functioning fine, but I am just concerned about this incessant log entrys.
I have tried to find more info on this, to no luck, do you perhaps have any suggestions ?

Would be appreciated.

Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are running two 8600s connected via IST, and with VRRP, but I noticed in my log files that I receive the following messages : </p>
<p>CPU5 [07/28/09 09:41:15] IP ERROR rcIpVrrpIn: Misconfigured Advertisement type (Fast Advtisement) for Vrid 8 on IfIndex 2054, Local type:regular Advertisement</p>
<p>The VRRP is functioning fine, but I am just concerned about this incessant log entrys.<br />
I have tried to find more info on this, to no luck, do you perhaps have any suggestions ?</p>
<p>Would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: blog.michaelfmcnamara.com @ 2012-02-08 18:23:26 by W3 Total Cache -->
